The show of emotion by Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail in New Hampshire brought on a flurry of press coverage, conversation and analysis. Was she cracking under stress? Did that make her “unpresidential”; unable to handle the pressure of the job? Would the scrutiny have been different if the emotion had been expressed by a man?
While the pundits thought it might be a death knell to her campaign, the voters of New Hampshire gave her a surprise victory. Why? Did it make her more human? Were women voters standing up saying, “Enough, treat her like the men and let’s talk about the issues?” I’m not a political analyst so I won’t attempt to answer those questions, but it does bring to mind all the pitfalls of emotion in the workplace, especially as it relates to women.
When does expressing emotion help? When does it harm? Are you damned if you do and damned if you don’t (as in the case of Hillary Clinton) – women often face the “Is she tough enough?” question. But then, if a woman is tough (as tough as man), the “B” factor arises – is she too tough?
I have often coached senior leaders and executives that it’s important to have a sense of inner confidence, vision and direction for others, intelligence, and courage to take on risks and great change. However, it is just as important to share a piece of your human side to others around you. Bottom line -- people feel more comfortable and are willing to trust someone, even under great change and ambiguity, when they see that emotional or human side. When Hillary said she was tired, frustrated and disappointed after so much hard work, people somehow were more able to identify with her – particularly women. She appeared real – even though she may have lost control of her emotions by showing her vulnerability, she gained the support of many who may have even shifted their vote from another candidate to her.
I start off in my book, It’s Not A Glass Ceiling, It’s A Sticky Floor, emphasizing that an important element for leaders to gain respect and trust and to draw people to them is by being an authentic leader -- knowing and being thyself. This calls for having self-awareness – knowing our strengths, weaknesses, intentions, passions, beliefs, and, yes, emotions. This means showing up on a regular basis as one who is transparent with their thoughts and feelings, and is consistent with their values, behaviors, words and actions.
There are times to be authentic when it comes to showing our emotions and passions. The key is to exercise emotions when it is appropriate. Hillary took a risk – she could have been pat, stoic and avoided showing how she really felt which was frustrated, tired and disappointed. But in this case she chose to be authentic. She showed a side of her that virtually no one has seen publicly before, but it was appropriate and it worked in the context of the situation.
While it is important to show our true emotions (and as women we have a deep emotional capacity), there are some practical guidelines when being tested emotionally:
1) It’s okay to show our feelings; however, we need to find the appropriate balance among our strengths, intellect and emotions. Showing up and emphasizing only one of these without the others does not come off as real or authentic.
2) Read your audience: Pay attention and have an awareness of the environment around you. Be cognizant of sharing different aspects of who you are or expressing your emotions at the right time, with the right people, and with the right message. In Hillary’s case, she was in an intimate environment and she responded to a personal question by a woman who was more interested in her well-being than her politics.
In short, the element of authenticity combined with situational awareness is a good formula for leadership.
Click here to read other blogs by Becky
Learn about SHAMBAUGH's Leadership Development Programs and their Women in Leadership and Learning (WILL) Program and Solutions
January 17, 2008 | Leave a Comment
robin gerber on 01/18 at 02:44 PM:
Hi Becky,
Many congratulations on finishing and publishing the book! I just found out. I remember when we first talked about it. I’ve done my first novel, just out this month. Let’s both keep writing! All the best, Robin
on 01/18 at 10:27 PM:
I applaud your attention to this topic and its relevancy for women in all walks of life. I especially resonate with your focus on Hillary’s authenticity and the relationship that holds with showing her emotions. Her behavior was a “win” for all women, because, it seemed to me, to show her emotions were coherent with her deeply held beliefs and values. Furthermore, she shared these emotions in a group with other women. Perhaps she felt safe enough to let down her guard and be herself, but I’d offer it’s more than that. Her audience --I’m referring to the world stage--was ready to embrace her genuineness, because most of us can only empathize with her and what it takes to run for President, as a woman. Showing our emotions at the right time, in the right context, with the right audience can be extremely powerful and liberating.
on 01/19 at 03:23 PM:
This was a topic of discussion this week at our WILL (Women in Leadersip and Learning) program. Several of the course participants had a great debate about Hillary in regard to Leadership Styles- the topic discussed that morning. They agreed with the last line of your blog- authenticity coupled with situational awareness (political savvy)is powerful- it combines the art and science of leadership!
on 01/21 at 07:19 PM:
Becky,
Your comments about Hillary’s authenticity and the risks involved with exposing ones emotional side were right on target. We women have the challenge of being ourselves in all its many manifestations while trying to avoid being stereotyped as manipulative, overly emotional or weak. I think Hillary set a great example of how a strong leader can be an appropriately sensitive human being.
on 01/21 at 08:19 PM:
Hillary has shown amazing poise throughout her campaign. She is a master of staying on message and demonstrating self-control. I think it says a lot about her character that she was willing to respond honestly to the question - it obviously paid off and injected some new energy into her campaign.
on 01/26 at 03:15 PM:
I think we’ve all been there - victims of too much or not enough emotion. Agree that “authenticity” and the need not to run around apologizing hits the mark. I have become much more forgiving of outbursts, etc. when I take time to remember that none us ever really knows what struggles a person may be dealing with. Side note… There’s a book recently published that’s getting pretty good press - The 30 Ways of Looking at Hillary that might be of interest to you.
on 02/08 at 08:48 PM:
How timely...At our monthly board of directors meeting, (which is myself and three girlfriends that call ourselves “the cashmere mafia"), we were coaching our friend that has just entered the workforce. We were discussing leadership styles and she was confused watching her male boss use directive solutioning when she instinctively wanted to use empathy and listening skills, but thought she better use his style. We told her that being authentic to her style will be the best approach. Being a woman and new in the office, reality is that you can easily get labeled if too directive early on.